The Hunt For Red Oc...
 
Notifications
Clear all

The Hunt For Red October Is The Hunt For Any Whistleblowers

2 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
173 Views
Posts: 423
Admin
Topic starter
Joined: 2 years ago

 

Hunter is more popular than he has ever been with the FBI, CIA, DOJ, and the political theater in DC. Somebody talked, let this be a learning experience for you gentlemen. We will retaliate against you and the man next to you. 

17 May 2023 - DOJ 'retaliates' against Hunter Biden probe whistleblower - Sky News Australia

 

and remember kids, the EXO loves to sniff and groom the new recruits.

 

The very best of Steven Seagal's UNDER SIEGE (1992) - rlfstr

 

Reply
1 Reply
Posts: 423
Admin
Topic starter
Joined: 2 years ago

 

@ 8:10 Alexander (speaking on the video) thinks the Durham report is a whitewash with nothing to bring charges against senior people at the FBI with any type of intent. Which is pretty much the same language. If I remember correctly Comely used with Hillary Clinton and her private email server. Extremely naive but with no intent. Durham sounds pretty much like the old crew. The House of Democratic cards are still up. The pump and dump for whistleblowers could begin. The more things change the more they stay the same.  All politicians want that whistleblower experience if you know what I mean. When there are only two major parties the problem is choice. @ 25:55 on the video, Biden was in the room but you won't find any references in the report.

 

18 May 2023 - The Durham Report and coverup. Where is Professor Mifsud? - The Duran

 

Hillary Clinton email controversy

A private server violated federal law, specifically 18 U.S. Code § 1924, regarding the unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or materials, as well as State Department protocols and procedures, and regulations governing recordkeeping.

In July 2016, FBI director James Comey announced that the FBI investigation had concluded that Clinton had been "extremely careless" but recommended that no charges be filed because Clinton did not act with criminal intent, the historical standard for pursuing prosecution

On June 14, 2018, the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General released its report on the FBI's and DOJ's handling of Clinton's investigation, finding no evidence of political bias and lending support for the decision to not prosecute Clinton.[14] A three-year State Department investigation concluded in September 2019 that 38 individuals were "culpable" in 91 instances of sending classified information that reached Clinton's email account, though it found "no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy

 

Which does not sound anything like Trump's mishandling of classified documents.

 

FBI investigation into Donald Trump's handling of government documents

In 2022, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) started the ongoing criminal investigation into former President Donald Trump's handling of classified and national defense-related government documents, looking for possible violations of the Espionage Act and obstruction of justice.

During his term in office, Trump's attitude toward and handling of classified information had worried U.S. federal intelligence officials.[3][4][5] His behavior led to mistrust in intelligence and law enforcement agencies who were also alarmed by Trump's mixing with guests during his frequent trips to Mar-a-Lago, viewing the practice as "ripe to be exploited by a foreign spy service eager for access to the epicenter of American power"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI_investigation_into_Donald_Trump%27s_handling_of_government_documents

 

 

Reply