Elijah, Isaiah 28, Military And The Epstein Files.

Do I have a story, a thread, or am I grasping at straws? Weaving puzzle pieces to form an opinionated picture. Some might say it’s how the mind copes with reality – imposing order on chaos. Hold the phone and let’s begin.

Conspiracies R Us: Virtually anyone can say that they are on some government watch list somewhere. Indeed, with the number of foreign government ministers on social media and the likes of X/Twitter. It has never been easier to increase your watch list position or potential by commenting out loud and on a government minister’s social media account.

There was, from my perspective, back in the day, more targeted approaches, where, depending on where you went, meant who you were seen by. An opinion also echoed throughout other users’ online experiences.

For Example, the various alleged back stories you can find for a conspiracy website like GodLike Productions. The basic theory was Godlike Productions was a United States Government disinformation site run out of Eglin Air Force Base. Jason Lucas aka ^TrInItY^ was actually the deputy director of an Air Force project called “TENA”. This, shall I say, is all highly speculative, as with the idea that the site had a lot of military personnel visiting this conspiracy board. Here are two links discussing the alleged military aspects of GodLike Productions.

https://popgeeks.com/what-the-heck-happened-to-godlike-productions

https://tavistockisfaggish.blogspot.com

AI Overview: The United States Air Force and the broader Department of Defense (DoD) have publicly acknowledged and documented research into social media behavior, narrative spread, and psychological operations (often referred to as Military Information Support Operations, or MISO)
as part of a shift toward modern information warfare.

Recent developments and public documentation highlight the following:

• Publicly Acknowledged Research & Doctrine: The Air Force Research Institute and Air University have published studies acknowledging the need for psychological operations to adapt to the internet and social media, noting that adversaries use these platforms to spread propaganda.
• Study of Social Media Trends: Research sponsored by the Air Force examines how social media behaves as a “force multiplier” and the necessity of understanding “commanding the trend” in online environments.
• Pentagon-wide Reviews: Following revelations that fake accounts suspected of being run by the U.S. military were identified by social media companies, the Pentagon ordered a sweeping review of its online psychological operations in September 2022 to ensure compliance with laws and policies.
• Focus on Foreign Audiences: Acknowledged PSYOP/MISO aims to influence the emotions, motives, and behaviors of foreign audiences. However, this has led to debates regarding the blurring of lines between public affairs and influence operations.

Enter Two More Conspracies And Then There Were Three

The next two conspiracies are that an elite group of rich and powerful run the world(hinted in the Epstein Files with co-conspirators) and Q Anon. Plus, the above introduction of the military being on social media boards, and conducting psychological operations takes us to three conspiracies that are spider-webbing into each other.

AI Overview: QAnon is a far-right conspiracy theory that originated in 2017, largely revolving around the false belief that former U.S. President Donald Trump is waging a secret war against a global cabal of satanic, cannibalistic pedophiles in government, business, and media. The movement frequently portrays the U.S. military as a heroic, central protagonist in this struggle. 

Key Aspects of the QAnon-Military Narrative:

• “The Storm” and Military Takeover: A core tenet of QAnon is that a day of reckoning, called “The Storm,” will occur, where top cabal members are arrested and subjected to military tribunals at Guantanamo Bay.
• “Digital Soldiers”: The movement often refers to its followers as “digital soldiers,” a term popularized by figures like former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, who has been described as a key influencer in the movement.
• Military Intelligence Infiltration: QAnon lore posits that “Q” is a high-level government insider (with “Q-level” clearance) leaking information about this secret war.
• Exploitation of Military Reputation: Researchers have identified that QAnon influencers use military language and symbolism to recruit new members, particularly targeting veterans and service members.
• Rejection of Authority: Despite the reverence for the military as an institution, some adherents believe that the military is currently in control of the government, often baselessly claiming that President Joe Biden’s inauguration was faked. 

Q Anon Conspiracy With Military Involvement: Q with the Q drops(Q posts) made plenty of references to the military. You can search a database of Q drops at https://qalerts.app/

Q seems to have many points of conjecture. The two I will be focusing on Q drop 26 and Q drop 3716.

#26
Think about it logically.
The only way is the military. Fully controlled. Save & spread (once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker).
Biggest advanced drop on Pol.

#3716
First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening.
FIRST ARREST will verify action and confirm future direction.
They will fight but you are ready.
Marker [9].

Coordinated Elite Cabal Conspiracy: From the Q drop #3716 we have “FIRST ARREST will verify action and confirm future direction.” First arrest, as with everything, is open to interpretation, but the first arrest represents a future direction. The direction is the way. Back to Q 26: The only way is the military.

So I am speculating, but the first arrest confirming future direction is a type of military arrest. So I find it particularly interesting that a Sky News Australia report includes the claim that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was allegedly ‘leaking defence and military secrets’. There is no confirmation, and in the scheme of things, it does not matter if my interpretations about the first arrest are wrong. What is important is a possible change in an attack vector in relationship with the Epstein Files, and that would be along the lines of national security, defence, and military secrets, and that sounds like a game changer for who now becomes involved with the investigations.

So sometimes you have to leave your interpretations at the door and track changes in positions and effects. Overseas arrests with what is being triggered out of the Epstein relationship is a change in position, and now, with possible links to national security, it is a dynamic change in the effects with the Epstein Files. We will also be doing this with Elijah, and Isaiah chapter 28. Instead of the literal interpretation, we will be looking at the position and the effects that the chapter is discussing.

Again, track position and effects rather than overcommit to a conclusion of interpretations. Why? Because sometimes knowing the level at which the discussions are happening is more important than the actual discussion. Call it a social consciousness – “You wanna graduate, but not in his bed. Here’s what you gotta do.”

AI Overview: Based on UK law and recent precedents, a leak of defence and military secrets typically transforms the investigation into a high-priority national security matter, often triggering investigations by specialized police units (such as the Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command) rather than just military internal affairs
.
Here is how the scenario changes:

1. Shift to Military Matters & Investigation The Law Involved: Such leaks are governed by the Official Secrets Act 1989 (specifically Section 2, which covers “Defence”) and the National Security Act 2023.
   Who Investigates: While the Ministry of Defence (MoD) will conduct an internal inquiry, a leak of “secrets” often involves the police (e.g., Northumbria Police or specialized Whitehall police units) to investigate criminal breaches.
   The “Damage” Requirement: To be prosecuted, the leak must be proven to be “damaging,” meaning it threatens to undermine military capabilities, compromise operational security, or endanger lives.
   Attorney General Consent: No prosecution can take place without the consent of the Attorney General, indicating this is treated as a state-level concern, not just a disciplinary matter.
2. “Military Use” of the Investigation Damage Limitation: The primary, immediate military use of the investigation is to mitigate the leak’s impact. This includes shutting down websites, identifying compromised personnel, and changing operational codes or locations.
   Threat Assessment: The military uses the findings to assess the danger to personnel, such as special forces operatives (SAS/SBS) or personnel in Afghanistan.
   Tightening Security: The investigation is used to fix flaws in data management (e.g., preventing the use of unencrypted, personal emails for sensitive data).
3. Contextual Changes (Example: 2025/2026 Reports) Recent leaks, such as the 2025 Special Forces data leak, show that if the leaks affect ongoing, high-stakes operations (like Afghan relocation), the military may seek a “super-injunction” to prevent media reporting to prevent further damage to lives.
   The investigation might reveal that “sensitive” material was handled poorly (e.g., in a “non-secure” manner), turning it from a criminal espionage investigation into a gross negligence inquiry.